Wednesday, September 10, 2008

ANWR

The topic I chose is the debate between the people and the government of drilling in Alaska. This topic surprisingly interested because I realize the gravity of our energy situation. Congress has supported the environmentalists twice in the past four years to support the no drilling policy in Alaska. ANWR stands for Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the environmentalists argue that the caribou, which are surrounding the territory where drilling would take place, are an endangered species and would be harmed through the drilling process. However there are several sources and images even of the workers that were drilling or inspecting the drilling area that were interacting with the caribou and not harming them at all. Rather getting along with them. Do not take me as a person who does not care about the environment, in fact that is one of my main concerns about this election. However this area in Alaska where the American people are wanting drilling to be done occupies 2,000 acres out of 19 million acres of the refuge that would be utilized for energy production. Both the presidential candidates have stated that they do not support drilling in the refuge area however President Carter in 1980 along with Congress set aside 1.5 million acres of ANWR's Northern Coastal Plain for potential oil development. It is surprising to me that our candidates are seeming to look over this incredible opportunity of energy production on our very own soil. Especially when I find it imperative to seperate our reliance on foreign oil and create our own resource. When the presidential candidates have repetitively faught for the voice of the American people and the American people are wanting to utilize this energy source, the candidates have no support in their supposed claim to want to speak for the American people. It is neccessary for us find and produce our own energy which is exactly what drilling in the ANWR territories would give us.

5 comments:

Tommy C. said...

Hey Allie,
I just want to say that you hit the nail on the head as far as I am concerned. I could not agree with you more. The way that the left wing and enviornmentalist have painted the picture of drillng in Alaska is so far from the truth, that many are left to believe we will be somehow destroying beautiful land, when in fact as you pointed out, we only need 2000 acres in a barren portion of the park where almost nothing lives. I sure hope McCain comes around and agrees with Palin that drilling there is an absolute must. Nice Job!

-R said...

I agree with you completely, and would also like to add that with the left-wing's portrayal of energy companies as not completely exploring the land they already lease from the government, oil companies are not going to drill where there is not oil.

I also feel that the equivalent of a few city blocks in an area the approximate size of many small states, is not going to create much of an environmental catastrophe, as voiced by many advocates of the left wing's ideals.

Thomas M. said...

I also agree with everything you said about prospecting for oil in Alaska. Like Richard said, oil companies aren't just going to start drilling randomly hoping they hit oil. When they go in, they expect oil in return because to them, oil equals money.

I hope that both Obama and McCain take this issue and debate about it because I'm interested in what they have to say about this.

Courtney J said...

Allie,

I'm exited to read your letter to the editor on Tuesday. I can tell you're passionate about ANWR after hearing you talk about it in class. This topic is going to be so important not only in this election, but in the coming years as we try to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. As we all are seeing from Sarah Palin, Alaska will probably play an integral part in the future of America's oil industry.

Unknown said...

You are so right. I don't have alot of knowledge about this topic but you seem to have a valid arguemnt. good luck!